Sunday, August 13, 2017
Tribulation Timeline
Virtually 100% of all timelines chronicling the great tribulation use as a foundation either the Book of Daniel or the Book of Revelation, and yet that does not line up with the warning given in Psalm 78. It is within this Psalm that God spoke thru the Prophet and Seer Asaph, warning not to forget His works and wonders. It is this single chapter within the Book of Asaph that drives home what future generations are to be built upon.
Let us consider the Stations of the Exodus, and how that may be directly tied to the division of time. One temporal saeculum repeatedly referred to in the Bible, God's Holy Word is forty two months. It is no secret that these months could be seen as 42 pins on a timeline.
01. Raamses
02. Sukkoth
03. Etham
04. Pi-Hahiroth
05. Marah
06. Elim
07. By the Red Sea
08. Sin Wilderness
09. Dophkah
10. Alush
11. Rephidim
12. Sinai Wilderness
13. Kibroth-Hattaavah
14. Hazeroth
15. Rithmah
16. Rimmon-Perez
17. Libnah
18. Rissah
19. Kehelathah
20. Mount Shapher
21. Haradah
22. Makheloth
23. Tahath
24. Tarah
25. Mithcah
26. Hashmonah
27. Moseroth
28. Bene-Jaakan
29. Hor Haggidgad
30. Jotbathah
31. Abronah
32. Ezion-Geber
33. Kadesh
34. Mount Hor
35. Zalmonah
36. Punon
37. Oboth
38. Abarim Ruins
39. Dibon Gad
40. Almon Diblathaim
41. Abarim Mountains
42. Moab Plains
The real point of consternation for most is the where the final plague, the death of the firstborn, would be on the Tribulation Timeline. This is really what must be "come to grips" with. I look at God's saying, "declaring the end from the beginning" as referring to opposite things that are equal. Therefor, although it is reasonable, most will not realize that what could be implied is exactly that. During the First Gathering He smote the first fruits of the oppressor, for the Final Gathering He will snatch the first fruits of the oppressed.
With that that put forth, I submit this for your review. Please post your questions and or comments, so that we all may edify, and be edified.
Friday, August 11, 2017
Dead Rise First - Matthew's Mistakes
Transcript of removed audio.
First instance:
So...
I already had all of this in my mind before I even looked. The last thing I looked at, Ladies and gentlemen, was First Thessalonians chapter four verse sixteen. That was the last thing I looked at. "For the Lord Himself shall descend from Heaven with a shout", what Delitzsch use here ladies and gentlemen? What did what did Ehrlich and Dalman both ratify? They both bore witness that he said the truth. Well Matthew's got problems right here, because right here the New Testament says that not Jesus...it states the Lord God Most High. This is what you call in English the tetragrammaton and I just set back. I don't...I don't understand because Delitzsch, Ehrlich, and Dalman all heard all the crap, I'm sure, that this was in reference to Christ coming down from heaven. No, this plainly says in the Hebrew Y-H-V-H in our tongue. It doesn't say Christ and I just... Listen I'll be perfectly honest with you, my mind wanted to reject what I was looking at. My mind wanted to reject it that he couldn't, they wouldn't've, all three of them would not have done that. They would have done it and ...
I have no idea what to make of this. There is no reason for me to debate with you. I'm looking at this in Hebrew. I know exactly what it says, and the second instance, of course, is "adown",the second letter half of that verse. I know what it says in Hebrew that part where it says "and the dead in Christ will rise first" that's "adown". What many people think is the Hebrew word "adowni", even though there's no Strong's word for that, it's "adowni". I just... CLINTON I don't know what to offer you for condolence if I've upset you. I don't know how to... I don't know how to help you or encourage you about what I just stated and everything that I said because I need some encouragement right now myself. How couldn't I have seen that before? Wait a minute, the Hebrew doesn't say, "Christ comes down", so you switch it over to the Editio Regia, what God actually said, and by the way once again, the whole planet knows that. Everybody knows. All church leaders Catholic, Orthodox, all the Prot... Everybody knew that the fifteen fifty one translation of the Editio Regia because he had tow secret manuscripts he would not give to the church nor to the government. Everybody knew. The entire world knew the Editio Regia was the correct New Testament translation, or manuscript. They knew it. Well that's why in Greek it doesn't say what I assumed it said. It doesn't say that "for Jesus Himself will descend from heaven with a shout", that's not what it says. No, no, no, no, no, no it's not it says. It says "kurios shall descend". In the last phrase it says "Christos", here in this case which is the dativ, singular, masculine case he actually said with his mouth "Cristo", so I know what He said. I'm not going to argue with you about what He actually said, but why didn't I see it until just now?
Have I shamed the Name of the Lord my God... by just seeing this now?
Had I always assumed that as soon as a martyr is beheaded, or thrown off a bridge, or shot they never went to Hades? Did God ever say that? No God never said that, I assumed it. Why did I assume they immediately went to the altar in heaven? Well why wouldn't they want to have a chit-chat with David? Why wouldn't I want to enjoy, well, let's say Mary? If they're woman, I'm sure they'd want to talk to exactly the women that witnessed. I'm sure they'd want to have a conversation you know be encouraged by, uhhh...you know, all three Marys. So what if God doesn't take them into... what if God doesn't take them from Paradise, which is in Hades, separated by guff, all the ancient scholars thought that it was like a floating island, that's the only way they could describe how guff could be on every side. They envisioned it like a floating island above Hades. That's where paradise is. I mean, it is appointed unto man once to die, then the judgment. Well technically speaking, if you die you have to enter into Hades, whether you go to paradise or not. So what if these people: they're martyred; their entered... they are taken into Hades; deposited in Abraham's bosom, which is paradise, and then periodically they are harvested to the throne? So the ones that are in paradise right now, that have been martyred, they haven't been harvested to the throne yet? I don't know. All I'm saying, that God never told me, not in Hebrew or Greek, when they're actually translated to His throne. He never said that. And why didn't I remember that God stated that? First you die then you're judged.
Well If you die you have to go to Hades you have too. I just... I don't know ladies and gentlemen, I don't know what to say, and I don't know how to console myself with the obvious incompetence I have displayed with God's word.
Second instance:
I know that's a direct reference to what Clinton was talking about those who would set down and rule with Christ...the Hamsharetim...Primus Resurrexerit.
The next verse.
Third instance:
Now listen to what Clinton brought out about the parable of the farmer. Ladies and gentleman they get torched before you're brought into the barn. Right? Right? That's what he just said, "going to gather you up"... but His recompense goes before him. Now that brings to mind.
First instance:
So...
I already had all of this in my mind before I even looked. The last thing I looked at, Ladies and gentlemen, was First Thessalonians chapter four verse sixteen. That was the last thing I looked at. "For the Lord Himself shall descend from Heaven with a shout", what Delitzsch use here ladies and gentlemen? What did what did Ehrlich and Dalman both ratify? They both bore witness that he said the truth. Well Matthew's got problems right here, because right here the New Testament says that not Jesus...it states the Lord God Most High. This is what you call in English the tetragrammaton and I just set back. I don't...I don't understand because Delitzsch, Ehrlich, and Dalman all heard all the crap, I'm sure, that this was in reference to Christ coming down from heaven. No, this plainly says in the Hebrew Y-H-V-H in our tongue. It doesn't say Christ and I just... Listen I'll be perfectly honest with you, my mind wanted to reject what I was looking at. My mind wanted to reject it that he couldn't, they wouldn't've, all three of them would not have done that. They would have done it and ...
I have no idea what to make of this. There is no reason for me to debate with you. I'm looking at this in Hebrew. I know exactly what it says, and the second instance, of course, is "adown",the second letter half of that verse. I know what it says in Hebrew that part where it says "and the dead in Christ will rise first" that's "adown". What many people think is the Hebrew word "adowni", even though there's no Strong's word for that, it's "adowni". I just... CLINTON I don't know what to offer you for condolence if I've upset you. I don't know how to... I don't know how to help you or encourage you about what I just stated and everything that I said because I need some encouragement right now myself. How couldn't I have seen that before? Wait a minute, the Hebrew doesn't say, "Christ comes down", so you switch it over to the Editio Regia, what God actually said, and by the way once again, the whole planet knows that. Everybody knows. All church leaders Catholic, Orthodox, all the Prot... Everybody knew that the fifteen fifty one translation of the Editio Regia because he had tow secret manuscripts he would not give to the church nor to the government. Everybody knew. The entire world knew the Editio Regia was the correct New Testament translation, or manuscript. They knew it. Well that's why in Greek it doesn't say what I assumed it said. It doesn't say that "for Jesus Himself will descend from heaven with a shout", that's not what it says. No, no, no, no, no, no it's not it says. It says "kurios shall descend". In the last phrase it says "Christos", here in this case which is the dativ, singular, masculine case he actually said with his mouth "Cristo", so I know what He said. I'm not going to argue with you about what He actually said, but why didn't I see it until just now?
Have I shamed the Name of the Lord my God... by just seeing this now?
Had I always assumed that as soon as a martyr is beheaded, or thrown off a bridge, or shot they never went to Hades? Did God ever say that? No God never said that, I assumed it. Why did I assume they immediately went to the altar in heaven? Well why wouldn't they want to have a chit-chat with David? Why wouldn't I want to enjoy, well, let's say Mary? If they're woman, I'm sure they'd want to talk to exactly the women that witnessed. I'm sure they'd want to have a conversation you know be encouraged by, uhhh...you know, all three Marys. So what if God doesn't take them into... what if God doesn't take them from Paradise, which is in Hades, separated by guff, all the ancient scholars thought that it was like a floating island, that's the only way they could describe how guff could be on every side. They envisioned it like a floating island above Hades. That's where paradise is. I mean, it is appointed unto man once to die, then the judgment. Well technically speaking, if you die you have to enter into Hades, whether you go to paradise or not. So what if these people: they're martyred; their entered... they are taken into Hades; deposited in Abraham's bosom, which is paradise, and then periodically they are harvested to the throne? So the ones that are in paradise right now, that have been martyred, they haven't been harvested to the throne yet? I don't know. All I'm saying, that God never told me, not in Hebrew or Greek, when they're actually translated to His throne. He never said that. And why didn't I remember that God stated that? First you die then you're judged.
Well If you die you have to go to Hades you have too. I just... I don't know ladies and gentlemen, I don't know what to say, and I don't know how to console myself with the obvious incompetence I have displayed with God's word.
Second instance:
I know that's a direct reference to what Clinton was talking about those who would set down and rule with Christ...the Hamsharetim...Primus Resurrexerit.
The next verse.
Third instance:
Now listen to what Clinton brought out about the parable of the farmer. Ladies and gentleman they get torched before you're brought into the barn. Right? Right? That's what he just said, "going to gather you up"... but His recompense goes before him. Now that brings to mind.
Sunday, March 12, 2017
Putnam's Riddle
Cris Putnam, bestselling author and Christian apologist, passed away unexpectedly on Wednesday, evening March 1, 2017. One of his last post on Logos Apologia was a riddle of sorts, and this post is in loving memory to Cris and the Godly legacy he has left. His post, Am I Coming Soon?, was truly a wonderful riddle, and it is my hope that you enjoy this, my answer to his riddle.
Four times does Jesus say in the Book of Revelation "I am coming quickly", and this phrase has been debated from the very beginning. The academics, whether from a religious point of view or not, all agree that Christ did not mean what He said. This is a little hard to counter because 2,000 years have in fact passed by. However, what may be the real issue of difficulty is what particular discipline of academia is being utilized for the exegesis of said phrase. Perhaps accredited studies in Koine Greek nor in Theology is what is truly required to decipher what Jesus was pointing to. Maybe the correct field of study is Mathematics, and more to the point Geometry.
The four verses in question is as follows.
Revelation 3:11 LITV Behold, I am coming quickly. Hold what you have that no one take your crown.
Revelation 22:7 LITV Behold, I am coming quickly. Blessed is the one keeping the Words of the prophecy of this Book.
Revelation 22:12 LITV And, behold, I am coming quickly, and My reward is with Me, to give to each as his work is.
Revelation 22:20 LITV The One testifying these things says, Yes, I am coming quickly. Amen. Yes, come, Lord Jesus!
The exact phrase in Koine Greek is "ερχομαι ταχυ" and all the translations, whether old or new, relays the aspect of a rather near event, not one that is far into the future. Unless, of course, you utilize the concept that time is cyclical and not linear. Looking at this as God actually wrote it, one thing comes to mind. It is a fact that the original languages of the Bible, God's Holy Word, that being Hebrew and Koine Greek, never had Arabic numerals. His Word was written long before Fibonacci introduced them to Western Mathematics in 1202.
It is the norm for Christian academics to either view prophecy, and hence time itself, as being linearly defined as past, present or future. This however is not what is contained within multiple verses of Scripture. Those verses paint an entirely different concept of time.
Ecclesiastes 1:9-10 LITV That which has been, it is that which shall be. And that which has been done, it is that which will be done. And there is no new thing under the sun. (10) Is there a thing of which one might say, See this, it is new? It has already been for the ages which were before us.
Ecclesiastes 2:12 LITV And I turned to behold wisdom, and madness, and folly. For what can a man do who comes after the king, when they have already done it?
Ecclesiastes 3:15 LITV That which has been, it already is; and that which is to be, it already has been. And God seeks what has gone by.
Ecclesiastes 6:10 LITV That which has been is named already, and it is known that he is man; and he is not able to contend with Him who is stronger than he.
Isaiah 46:10 LITV declaring the end from the beginning, and from the past those things which were not done, saying, My counsel shall rise; and, I will do all My desire;
All of these verses state that time is cyclical not linear. This also needs to be magnified by the simple fact that the letters used to write them are also numbers, one and all. As already stated, the original languages used are AlphaNumeric by design, never containing Arabic numerals. This being the case, let us look at this phrase mathematically.
When the letters are used as Greek number we see wondrous things whereas ""ερχομαι ταχυ" is in reality the sums 826 and 1301 respectively. This is one of geometry's greatest conundrums. You see when you put this into equation form it is thus.
1301 / 826 = 1.57
This integer 1.57 is known to be defined as:
π/2 = 90 and (pi)3.14/2 = 1.57
In effect, Jesus was stating He was half of the circle, or time itself.
We also see other integers at work for 826 + 1301 = 2127. Anther way of stating that is "ζωοποιουντος" in the Koine Greek. This being the singular word that equates to that sum is found in two verses, and means variously make alive, give life, or quicken.
Romans 4:17 LITV according as it has been written, "I have appointed you a father of many nations;" before God, whom he believed, the One making the dead live, and calling the things that are not as if they were.
1 Timothy 6:13 LITV I charge you before God, He making all things alive, and Christ Jesus, the One witnessing the good confession to Pontius Pilate,
I hope you have been edified, and remember to offer up your prayers for Cris' loved ones. Time will prove that though Cris is gone, he shall be back around the ride. The Lord Jesus Christ will raise him up on the last day, and in that you can rest assured.
God bless - God speed,
Matthew
All
scripture from Green's Literal Translation (LITV).
Copyright
1993 by Jay P. Green Sr.
Copyright
03/12/2017
Matthew
Miller
Friday, March 10, 2017
Exegesis on Pi and its Biblical Usage as a Temporal Integer
There
are two topics in the world in which we live that will inevitably
intersect. When it comes to popularity and frequency of use, these
two things, Pi and the Bible, they both stand out in ways that are
incomprehensible.
First
let us consider Pi. Irregardless of people, place, or language, if
the task at hand is figuring the dimension of the world that we find
ourselves upon, or any world for that matter, you must utilize one
math - one equation - one symbol - one language that defines the
circle of life, and that one thing is Pi.
Since its inception of use in 1706 by the British mathematician
William Jones1,
the Greek letter Pi has defined the ratio of a circle's circumference
to its diameter. Numbers are universal in math as the Greek alphabet
is universal in mathematical constants. It does not matter in which
mathematical field you walk, or in which mathematical language you
speak, whether arithmetic, algebra, geometry or calculus, the
equation is C/d = Pi
and
Pi equals 3.14. It's usage is infinite, and it's popularity extends
not only to a Google Doodle2,
but as of March 12, 2009, Pi Day has been designated March 14 (3/14
in the month/day date format) by the United States 111th Congress
with H.R. 2243.
More recently it has been put forth by Melissa Hogenboom to be
arguably the most beautiful of all equations4.
Secondly,
and only so by order, not importance, let us contemplate the Bible.
No other book has known anything remotely close to its constant
multilinguistical usage. It is currently being translated into 1,300
new languages and has already been translated into 1,185 languages5.
It is not only the most highly cited source in history, with regards
to nonfiction, it is the most highly quoted written work in both
private and public speeches. It has been utilized by emperors,
conquerors, usurpers, presidents, prime ministers, and all varying
types of both elected and non-elected government officials. It has
been cited as a source in the West, East, Middle East, and Far East
as well as both Northern and Southern Hemispheres. The Bible has set
the code of conduct for more individuals and set the rule of law for
more of the total population ever born than any other book in
history. Its popularity as far as the volume of total sales are
concerned is absolutely staggering. When articles are written about
which book is the "best seller" it is the standard not to
include the Bible because it is common knowledge it holds prime
position6.
Daniel Radosh points out that the Bible, being the best-selling book
of all time, obscures a more startling fact: that the Bible is the
best-selling book of the year, every year7.
One
fact that is obscured more than most, it that Pi was always a number.
It is the truth that Pi has always equaled 80. That has always been
the case because the Greek language was always alphanumerical in its
written form, that is to say, the letters were also the numbers. It
predates the advent of Arabic numerals (also Hindu–Arabic numeral
system or Hindu numeral system) by thousands of years. This comes as
a shock to most when they first realize that there were no 1s, 2s, or
3s in the ancient languages. Those things did not enter into the
historical equation until Leonardo Fibonacci penned his 1202 book,
"Liber Abaci", promoting its use in the west. With this in
mind, that means that the Bible was composed alphanumerically from
its very beginning.
The
Bible was originally penned for the private use of Israelites in
Hebrew. Later, it was transcribed into Greek to be included in the
Library of Alexandria8
for
consumption by the general population. Both of these "original",
if you will, languages are alphanumeric and they always have been.
In the Hebrew and Greek, you characterize numbers by either spelling
them out or writing them out (one-hundred forty-four). The process
of alphanumerics is called Isopsephy(ισος
(isos) "equal" and ψηφος (psephos) "pebble")
in Greek and Gematria(Greek
γεματρία, "geometry") in Hebrew respectively.
These
two alphanumeric processes can be utilized to determine if the ratio
of Pi(22/7)
can be found in the Biblical text. For this exercise, we will be
using the 826th
chapter of the Bible commonly called Ezekiel, the 24th
chapter. I have selected the 1,290 day sequence from Daniel 12:11
for our Pi ratio(1290/410).
These
verses, or equations rather, will be given in the following format:
wordinteger
Ezekiel
24:23 Septuagint
και31
αι11
κομαι141
υμων1290
επι95
της508
κεφαλης764
υμων1290
και31
τα301
υποδηματα904
υμων1290
εν55
τοις580
ποσιν410
υμων1290
ουτε775
μη48
κοψησθε1012
ουτε775
μη48
κλαυσητε964
και31
εντακησεσθε803
εν55
ταις511
αδικιαις256
υμων1290
και31
παρακαλεσετε748
εκαστος796
τον420
αδελφον660
αυτου1171
Ezekiel
24:14 Masoretic
אני61
יהוה26
דברתי616
באה8
ועשיתי796
לא31
אפרע351
ולא37
אחוס75
ולא37
אנחם99
כדרכיך274
וכעלילותיך602
שפטוך415
נאם91
אדני65
יהוה26׃
796
+ 31 + 351 + 37 + 75 =
1290
37
+ 99 + 274 =
410
These
results are conclusive, whereas 1290/410
equates to Pi = 3.14. It would appear that the results point to a
cyclical aspect to time. Although this is not new, as the ancient
Indian, Greek, Egyptian, Mayan and Aztec scholars viewed time in this
manner, it is completely
unconsidered by theologians both past and present. There can be no
doubt that the Author of Ezekiel, the 24th
chapter, mathematically inserted the 1,290 day sequence in a cyclical
nature by utilizing the 3.14 ratio of a circle's circumference to its
diameter. The hypothesis presented should also play out on a
grandeur design with this chapter, if any credence is to be
accredited to it. The chapter in question presents the equation
826/263
as Pi = 3.14.
Ezekiel
24:1 Masoretic
ויהי31
דבר206
יהוה26
אלי41
בשנה357
התשיעית1195
בחדש314
העשירי595
בעשור578
לחדש342
לאמר271׃
263
=
31
+ 206 + 26
Ezekiel
24:2 Masoretic
בן52
אדם45
כתוב428
לך50
את401
שם340
היום61
את401
עצם200
היום61
הזה17
סמך120
מלך90
בבל34
אל31
ירושלם586
בעצם202
היום61
הזה17׃
202
+ 61
= 263
Ezekiel
24:8 Masoretic
להעלות541
חמה53
לנקם220
נקם191
נתתי860
את401
דמה49
על100
צחיח116
סלע160
לבלתי472
הכסות491׃
401
+ 49 + 100 + 116 + 160
= 826
Ezekiel
24:10 Masoretic
הרבה212
העצים215
הדלק139
האש306
התם445
הבשר507
והרקח319
המרקחה358
והעצמות617
יחרו224׃
507
+ 319
= 826
Ezekiel
24:13 Masoretic
בטמאתך472
זמה52
יען130
טהרתיך644
ולא37
טהרת614
מטמאתך510
לא31
תטהרי624
עוד80
עד74
הניחי83
את401
חמתי458
בך22׃
52
+ 130 + 664
= 826
Ezekiel
24:15 Masoretic
ויהי31
דבר206
יהוה26
אלי41
לאמר271׃
263
=
31
+ 206 + 26
Ezek
24:19 Masoretic
ויאמרו263
אלי41
העם115
הלא36
תגיד417
לנו86
מה45
אלה36
לנו86
כי30
אתה406
עשה375׃
263
Ezekiel
24:22 Masoretic
ועשיתם826
כאשר521
עשיתי790
על100
שפם420
לא31
תעטו485
ולחם84
אנשים401
לא31
תאכלו457׃
826
These
findings indicate that Ezekiel Twenty-four is cyclical in nature. The
Author of this text mathematically inserted the chapter number in a
cyclical nature by utilizing the 3.14 ratio of a circle's
circumference to its diameter. This is accomplished 8 times, four
826's and four 263's.
This
data supports the hypothesis that time is cyclical, therefore
Eschatology Isochronal. This comes at odds with academic theology 2
ways.
- The 1,290 days is a reoccurring sequence of time.
- Ezekiel 24 is a reoccurring prophetic event.
- Berggren, Lennart; Borwein, Jonathan; Borwein, Peter (1997). Pi: a Source Book. Springer-Verlag. ISBN 978-0-387-20571-7.
- 14 March 2010 - Pi Day http://www.google.com/doodles/pi-day
- United States. Cong. House. Supporting the designation of Pi Day, and for other purposes. 111th Cong. Library of Congress.
- Hogenboom, Melissa. "You decide: What is the most beautiful equation?" BBC 20 January 2016
- "Bible Statistics". Statistic Brain Research Institute 28 April 2013 http://www.statisticbrain.com/bibles-printed/
- "The 15 Biggest Bestsellers EVER After The Bible (PHOTOS)". Huffington Post 30 July 2010
- Radosh, Daniel. "The Good Book Business." The New Yorker 16 December 2006
- Dines, Jennifer M. The Septuagint, Michael A. Knibb, Ed., London: T&T Clark, 2004.
Matthew
Miller
3/12/16
Prophetico
Productions
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)